|
Sales and profit margins combine to produce earnings. It takes
both. Here’s the formula:
earnings = sales x profit margin
I call it the E=SP formula. Memorize it, even if you hate math
and flunked algebra.
The E=SP formula makes it clear that sales and margins both determine
earnings. It’s tough for companies to report consistent earnings
growth if sales rise, but profit margins drop, or vice versa. Let’s flesh out
the concept with numbers.
Suppose that a company sold $1,000 worth of products during
the last quarter at a 15 percent profit margin. According to E=SP, the
company earned $150.
earnings = $1,000 x 0.15 = $150
If nothing changes in the next quarter, the company will again
rack up sales of $1,000 and it will again earn $150.
That would create a problem for shareholders if it did happen because
earnings growth, or the expectation of earnings growth, is usually
what drives stock prices up.
E=SP tells us that the only way to boost earnings is to increase
sales and/or profit margins. In the best case, good management can combine
sales growth with growing profit margins, and then earnings grow
faster than sales.
The bottom line number announced on earnings report day is
earnings per share (EPS), which is net income divided by the number of
outstanding shares.
earnings per share = net income/shares outstanding
A company with lackluster growth can boost its EPS by buying
back its stock, thereby reducing the number of shares outstanding.
Costco, Gap, Microsoft, Pfizer, and Walgreen results characterize
most companies, with net income and earnings per share closely
tracking sales.
Avon Products and IBM typify companies that, despite lackluster
sales growth, still manage to grow earnings at a respectable rate by
productivity improvements combined with share buybacks.
Intel embodies the ideal situation; fast-growing sales and even
faster growing earnings. That’s history, though. Notice that Intel’s sales
growth slowed markedly in the 1997 to 2000 timeframe, even though
the tech sector was flying high.
Cisco Systems, the fastest grower of the group, hasn’t done a
good job of translating sales growth to profits. Worse, EPS growth
didn’t track net income, reflecting Cisco’s inclination to use its stock to
boost sales via acquisitions, consequently diluting shareholder value.
Bottom line, you won’t go wrong starting with the assumption
that, long-term, most companies’ earnings growth will track sales
growth. In the short-term it’s a different story. Stock prices respond to
all sorts of stimuli. It’s up to you to filter out the fundamentally significant
information from the day-to-day noise. |